Edible crops are dappling our cities’ skylines in growing numbers, and yet, the blossoming North American rooftop agriculture movement remains in its infancy. As rooftop farmers and gardeners increasingly build knowledge by experimenting and improvising with things like crop selection, staking techniques, and soil amendments, is there room at the table for formal scientific inquiry?
In celebration of my one-year anniversary as a landscape performance researcher (and licensed landscape architect!) with the Philadelphia-based landscape architecture and ecological planning firm Andropogon, it seems appropriate to give a nod to research. Entering this world of site performance analysis has heightened my awareness of the need for field research, or in this case “roof research” (pun intended), to cultivate useful information for rooftop agriculture stakeholders, from growers to restauranteurs to entrepreneurs.
At its core, scientific inquiry allows us to better understand our world through developing questions and then proposing evidence-based explanations. This process may allow us to notice trends, such as tomato plants producing more fruit on rooftops than at-grade, or even formulate cause and effect theories, like increased soil drainage causes increased tomato fruit production. Building a body of scientific research around rooftop agriculture is essential in maximizing the legitimacy of our young movement and the quality/efficiency of production. While publications exist about the benefits of rooftop agriculture and opportunities for industry-wide growth, surprisingly few studies have been published that address the technical “how to” of rooftop farming or vegetable gardening.
One notable rooftop farm engaged in an experimental study in 2013. The McCormick Place Rooftop Farm launched a “thin farming” research effort to determine the optimal soil amendment regiment for a smattering of rooftop crops grown in full sun and partial shade. The study, conducted by the Chicago Botanic Garden’s urban agriculture education and jobs-training initiative, Windy City Harvest, involved 20 test plots that composed the then, 1/4-acre farm, with systematic additions of 0%, 30%, 50%, or 70% amendments (by volume) in the planting hole of each veggie start. Daily observational data fed into a study and informed the subsequent year’s crop management strategy. Since that time, the farm has expanded to 2.5-acres – the Midwest’s largest rooftop farm – and produces 8,000 lbs. of produce annually for use by the McCormick Place convention center in the building below.
How can you engage in scientific inquiry within your rooftop farm or veggie garden? Here are six easy steps to follow:
1| Research question: Develop a question that can be answered through the collection of quantifiable data, such as pounds of fruit, height of plants, frequency of irrigation, or number of maintenance visits. This question may be causal in nature: How does soil drainage affect tomato yields?
2| Literature review: Perform a survey of published literature to better understand what questions others have asked, how they’ve investigated those questions, and what findings they reached. Like most non-academics, I don’t have access to expensive journal databases, like EBSCOhost, so I usually begin surveying the literature through Google Scholar. When I find relevant publications, I add them to a running list of references using the Purdue Owl Writing Lab‘s user friendly APA formatting rules.
3| Hypothesis: Based on your literature review, develop an educated guess about what will happen in your experiment: If soil drainage increases, then tomato yields will increase. Also acknowledge the opposite, or null hypothesis, which you will later accept or reject: If soil drainage increases, then tomato yields will not increase.
4| Experimental design: Next, plan an experiment in which you can change one condition, or variable, at a time (such as degree of soil drainage) while keeping all other conditions constant. This is how you isolate the variable you’re examining to support causal findings. You’ll need a comparison that shares the constant conditions, which will serve as the experimental control. Be sure that your sample size (such as number of tomato plants) is large enough to reach statistically significant findings, which can become even more significant it the study is replicated.
5| Data collection + analysis: Now you’re ready to carry out the investigation that you designed. Set a schedule for collecting data then make sure that the data is obtained the same way, ideally by the same person, each time. After the experiment is complete, thoughtfully analyze the data to draw relationships between evidence and explanations.
6| Communication: Sharing what you learned is the most critical step of the scientific process, assuming you aim to advance the rooftop agriculture industry’s knowledge base! Scientific communication traditionally involves publishing a paper in a scientific journal or presenting your results at a conference during a talk or on a poster. As a practitioner-researcher, I additionally find great value in writing about studies in trade magazines and blogs, and speaking about them at all sorts of conferences and events. These outlets generally reach audiences beyond the scientific community, and in the case of rooftop agriculture, the practitioners may be your target.
Standing on the roof of SHARE Food Program in north Philadelphia, the audible hum of bee wing vibration is hypnotizing. Workers dart out of their hives to forage for pollen and nectar, others sluggishly return with caked pollen baskets, and those within the stacked wooden boxes flap incessantly to cool the hives for their queen. Up on a roof these canopy dwellers are right at home, and with so much activity buzzing around the hives, it’s hard to believe these bees, like their brethren throughout the country, have a slim chance of survival.
Since its importation to the U.S. in the mid-1600s, the European honey bee (Apis mellifera) has unequivocally shaped our food system, contributing more than $19.2 billion to the value of crop production within the U.S., according to a 2010 study by Cornell University researchers. While most agricultural crops are visited by a variety of pollinator insects, the American Beekeeping Federation notes that certain crops, like blueberries and cherries, are 90% dependent upon honey bees for pollination. Almonds possess the unique quality of being entirely dependent, requiring an annual importation of 1 million colonies, or 41% of all U.S. managed honey bee colonies, just to satisfy California’s crop.
Tragically (particularly for almond lovers), in 2006 the U.S. honey bee population began plummeting due to Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), a syndrome resulting in the exodus and death of drones from the hive, leaving the queen and immature bees marooned, to perish. The definitive cause of CCD has yet to be scientifically determined, but speculations include parasites, pathogens, pests, poor nutrition, sublethal exposure to pesticides, climate change, and low genetic diversity, or some combination thereof. What a buzz kill.
But there’s hope! Enter North America’s 4,000+ native bee species. Do these insects have what it takes to pollinate our farm fields, yards, stoops, window boxes, and edible skylines? “According to scientists, natives are more than up to the task of filling in for beleaguered honey bees,” writes National Wildlife senior editor Laura Tangley in her provocative article, “Being there for the bees.” This diverse, rarely-studied group of insects co-evolved with many of North America’s native flowering plants and are therefore critical to our ecosystems and food supply. “In the United States alone, native bees contribute at least $3 billion a year to the farm economy,” says Mace Vaughan, an expert quoted in Tangley’s article. Native bees are solely responsible for pollinating crops such as tomatoes and eggplant, and much more efficient than honey bees at pollinating many native crops, like pumpkins, watermelons, blueberries, and cranberries.
Taxonomically, all bees belong to the sub-order Anthophila and one of six families: Andrenidae (mining bees), Apidae (cuckoo, carpenter, digger, bumble, honey bees), Colletidae (plasterer bees, masked or yellow-faced bees), Halictidae (sweat bees), Megachilidae (leaf-cutter bees, mason bees, allies), and Melittidae (melittid bees). Unlike the honey bee, most native North American bees are relatively solitary in nature; nest underground, in hollow stems, or in dead wood; and don’t make honey. Their biggest threats to survival include disease, habitat loss, pesticide exposure, climate change, and most recently, insecticide spraying intended to target Zika-carrying mosquitoes. Despite these pressures, it’s conceivable that native bees’ incredible genetic diversity provides an advantage over the honey bee in resisting CCD. With more research, increased education about the habits and importance of native bees, and a ban on insecticide spraying, pollinator populations will hopefully stabilize.
Here’s how your rooftop farm or vegetable garden can help native bees and our food system:
- Provide nesting sites | Build or buy in a native bee nest (they’re beautiful!) for installation in your farm or garden, or on a nearby roof area. If you see ground-nesting native bees in your media, try to stay out of their way so they can do their job.
- Plant native flowering plants | Make sure a variety of native plants on your roof are booming from early spring through late fall to provide native bees with a variety of pollen and nectar sources. Long-blooming herbs offer a great supplement to vegetable plants.
- Offer a water source | Bees get thirsty! Make sure to provide a rooftop watering source so your pollinators don’t wonder off.
- Eliminate chemical use | Keep your rooftop farm or garden chemical free by avoiding synthetic insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizers.
- Tell your friends | Don’t be shy about proselytizing what you’ve learned about supporting native bees! Make sure prospective growers know that your farm or garden is the bees knees.
This Valentine’s Day season I’d like to be as close to chocolate as possible, and consumer market trends suggest that I’m not alone. For those of us living far from the equator, though, the main ingredient in chocolate, cacao, travels an incredible distance to reach our plates. Cacao are seeds, often referred to as “beans,” found within football-shaped pods that grow from the trunk and branches of the cacao tree (Theobroma cacao). The tree is native to the South American lowlands and is now propagated within rainforests throughout the equatorial tropics and sub-tropics of Central America and parts of South America, Africa, and Asia.
The process of deriving coco from the cacao bean is labor-intensive and is often performed by growers and plantation owners in remote areas. Once cacao pods ripen, they’re cut from the tree and the beans are extracted. The beans are fermented, laid on a flat surface to dry, and then generally exported to another country where they are roasted. The roasted beans are ground to a fine powder called cocoa, which is then blended with sugar and other ingredients to produce the creamy sweetness that we’ve grown to love.
“Cacao seeds, or ‘beans,’ have to be dried after fermentation as a measure to prevent molds [and] mildews from growing on them during transport,” explains botanical scientist and cacao expert Dr. Cindy Skema. “It is a bit of an art, though, because the beans must not be over-dried because they can become too brittle and that creates problems in processing.” As you may imagine, naturally flat areas for drying cacao beans are a rarity for many rainforest inhabitants. Some growers and plantation owners build structures specifically designed to dry the beans, with protective covers that are either static or slide on tracks, like a convertible roof, to protect the crop from incoming rain storms and shield the beans from insects and birds. Others lay beans on their village’s concrete, central square, as I’ve seen myself in rural Venezuela.
In isolated instances around the world growers have been seen industriously using their rooftops as drying grounds for cacao beans. Multiple examples exist in Trinidad, but growers and plantation owners in Brazil, Ghana, the Dominican Republic, Grenada (in the Caribbean), Vanuatu (in the South Pacific), and Mexico have also pursued the practice. In Oaxaca, Mexico, chocolatier consultant and author Clay Gordon visited a family farm that allocated roof areas to drying cacao because this location was, “out of the reach of chickens,” he says. Gordon explains, though, that drying cacao on roofs is not a common practice due primarily to, “the labor of getting the beans up there in the first place. Furthermore, not all roofs [in cacao-growing locations] are flat or sturdy – many of them are pitched and made of galvanized corrugated metal, which is not a good surface for drying beans.”
Skema agrees that drying cacao on rooftops is not very common, but to her, the practice comes as no surprise. “It makes sense,” she says, “I mean [the roof] is a typically open, available space that gets very hot and is a bit cleaner than ground level, or at least without people [or] animals walking through.” Skema notes that around the world roofs are used to dry a variety of things, like edible plant material, meat, and clothes.
Agriculture involves not just food production, but also processing, or the preparation of crops for sale via washing, fermenting, drying, etc. Rooftop agriculture generally evokes images of crops strictly in production, even for me, and we rarely stop to think about supplementary agricultural practices fit for rooftops. Using roofs to dry cacao is a beautiful example of the creativity of farmers who, in all reaches of the world, have independently developed the same practice.
This Valentine’s Day, when you’re craving chocolate, pause to think about whether your indulgence spent part of its lifetime on a roof, under the sun, and what other non-production agricultural practices could occupy our rooftops.
Bletter, Nat. Email correspondance. 17 November 2015.
Gordon, Clay. Email correspondence. 18 November 2015.
Skema, Cynthia. Email correspondance. 10 November 2015.
Skema, Cynthia. “Ka-Pow Cacao.” Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania. 100 E Northwestern Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19118. Lecture.
What would your city look like if urban agriculture drove development? The University of Arkansas Community Design Center posed this question in 2012 when a team of designers, scientists, lawyers, and students explored what their rapidly densifying city of Fayetteville, AR would look like by 2030, the point at which the population is projected to double to approximately 140,000 residents. The team, led by Community Design Center director Stephen Loni, used scenario planning – a speculative process that anticipates how specific decisions will shape long-term realities – to develop “Fayetteville 2030: Food City Scenario,” or Food City, as it’s better known. This visually enticing project depicts a future Fayetteville that prioritizes food security and food localization as organizing elements of urban growth. Food City has earned national recognition by winning multiple awards, including an ASLA 2015 Professional Honor Award, and appearing as the subject of a feature article in Landscape Architecture Magazine‘s January 2016 issue, written by EAT UP author Lauren Mandel.
“When you’re trying farm farmers and grow growers, it’s all about accessibility,” says Fayetteville urban farmer Don Bennett, who founded Tri Cycle Farms in 2011. Don and his flock of volunteers, many of whom are food insecure, cultivate nearly 2-acres of land in the city’s geographic center using permaculture techniques. Don is part of a growing food localization movement in Fayetteville that focuses in large part on food equity and access. Other local, budding establishments that help bring fresh, nutritious food to Fayetteville’s residents include Feed Fayetteville (a food security non-profit), Apple Seeds Teaching Farm (a hands-on agricultural education site), The Farmer’s Table Cafe (a popular farm-to-table restaurant) and the Fayetteville Farmers’ Market (which was established in 1973 and is now the largest producer and vendor market in Arkansas).
Do you want to learn what’s on-tap for Fayetteville’s transforming food system and read more about the people behind the movement? Check out “The Next Meal” in Landscape Architecture Magazine‘s digital January 2016 issue or pick up the print edition at your local Barnes & Noble store before mid-February.
Not sure what to give your hip, garden-loving, urban foodie this holiday season? How about a carbon neutral gift that they’ll use to gain inspiration and change the world? “EAT UP | the inside scoop on rooftop agriculture” makes the perfect gift or stocking-stuffer for your mom/dad/aunt/uncle/cousin/daughter/son/friend/neighbor, or even that cute guy down the street. Through case studies, checklists, and interviews with rooftop agriculture’s industry leaders, this book inspires readers to garden their own rooftop and farm the skyline. Don’t fret, EAT UP‘s available through Amazon Prime and as an e-book.
In case you need some extra convincing, here are the top 10 reasons to buy EAT UP this holiday season:
The Kansas City Royals may have won this year’s World Series, but the Boston Red Sox were the real 2015 winners. While this American League team’s game may not have been up to snuff, it’s historic stadium knocked one out of the park in April when Fenway Park representatives announced their plans to build a rooftop farm, the first in major league baseball. Later that month Fenway Farms materialized, with its first harvest in May. Now the weather is halting production for the year, which offers the facility’s designers and farmers time to reflect on the farm’s inaugural growing season.
“All the stars aligned to make this project go forward, but it was ultimately Linda Henry, married to the owner of the Red Sox, who breathed life into it,” says Mark Winterer, the farm’s designer and co-owner of Recover Green Roofs, LLC in Somerville, MA. “One-year prior to Linda’s involvement, The Red Sox contacted Recover and was interested in a Sedum green roof. While we couldn’t find the financing to build the Sedum green roof, we were able to find the right [roof area that could support the load of a farm], so when Linda got involved, we were ready to go,” says Winterer. Fenway Farms is located atop the stadium’s Front Office, on the third base side at the EMC Club Level. It’s visible from both the EMC Club and State Street Pavilion Levels, but accessible to the public only during stadium tours. Stop & Shop, Dole, Sage Fruit and Aramark financed the project.
The approximately 4,000 pounds of vegetables and herbs grown at Fenway Farms annually make their way into dishes prepared in the stadium’s EMC Club kitchen. The stadium’s chefs, including Fenway Park executive chef Ron Abell, choose which crops will be grown each season from a master list, which are then planted in spring and summer by Green City Growers, an urban farming company that serves eastern Massachusetts.
“Cucumbers did really well,” says Green City Growers CEO and founder, Jessie Banhazl, “we harvested 600 pounds of cucumbers [during the 2015] season. Kale, lettuce, carrots, peppers, and eggplants also did well this year.” Banhazl was surprised by a unexpectedly vigorous strawberry crop, so much so that she’s amending next year’s crop plan to include more berries and fruit for Fenway Park’s pastry kitchen.
The farm system itself, designed and installed by Recover Green Roofs, consists of rows of modular plastic crate growing systems lined with filter fabric sleeves – called “Recover Aerated Media Modules“ (R.A.M.M.) – filled with 10-inches of Vermont Compost custom blended organic soil, with a Weathermatic Smartlink drip irrigation system. The planter design closely resembles that at Higher Ground Farm, atop the Boston Design Center, designed and built by Recover Green Roofs in 2013. “Fenway asked if we could do something similar to Higher Ground Farms,” says Winterer, “they liked the idea that it was a relatively inexpensive option, and that they could remove it if need be.”
What changes did the Fenway design include as a result of what Recover Green Roofs learned from the earlier project? “We learned to buy prefabricated fabric liners because Higher Ground Farms found it difficult to hand make those liners using filter fabric,” recounts Winterer, “we also used individual drip emitters [within each] milk crate instead of using your typical drip line with emitters spaced 12-inches on center.”
One of the most unique qualities shared by both projects is their use of potting soil instead of the modified, lightweight green roof media that’s typically deployed in rooftop farms. Winterer explains that, “the big take-away from Higher Ground Farm is that the milk crate allowed them to use potting soil up on a roof without worrying about it blowing away. Vegetable plants are much happier in potting soil than engineered growing media.” While the plants may be happy, modified green roof media is generally preferred for rooftop farms because it remains structurally stable (without breaking down or compacting) while maintaining its drainage capacity. By contrast, potting soil decomposes, compacts, and can easily clog filter fabrics within a single season. These properties suggest that soil replacement may be a necessary component of the Fenway Farms maintenance plan, which may be worth the hassle given the plants’ high productivity in this optimal soil environment.
What changes would the chefs like to see next year? Fewer radishes! “Radishes also did really well, which the kitchen was not happy about,” says Banhazl, jokingly, “we’ll have to pair back on how many we plant this year, they were rolling their eyes at us by the end of the spring every time we walked in with more radishes.”
Loquacious urban agriculture enthusiasts, like myself, revel in spreading the rooftop agriculture gospel. I’ll happily talk your ear off about the countless benefits of rooftop farming, explain the technical intricacies of skyline farm design, and debate the most robust rooftop crops. What I don’t often talk about, what most rooftop agriculture experts don’t often mention in depth, is finance, the elephant in the room.
Earlier this week at Green Roofs for Healthy Cities‘ annual Grey to Green Conference in Toronto, I tackled this “elephant” head on with collaborators Ben Flanner (head farmer and president of Brooklyn Grange) and Mark Winterer (co-owner and director of operations at Recover Green Roofs, LLC). Ben’s company owns and maintains two of the largest commercial rooftop row farms in the U.S. (totaling 2.5 acres) within the NYC region, and Mark’s company designs and builds green roofs in the Boston area, with a specialization in food roofs. Together, we approached the topic of rooftop agriculture finance through the complimentary lenses of designer, farmer/business owner, and contractor.
Here are some of our main talking points, aimed at helping aspiring skyline farmers and entrepreneurs develop strong financing strategies. One of the underlying messages throughout the talk was that while there are varied agricultural production methods and numerous financing strategies, no single approach is “right;” the approaches are simply different.
1| Designing with intent: The first step in realizing your vision for a rooftop farm is pinning down your primary goals. Identifying your objectives and priorities early, while thinking about the big picture, will help you to stay focused and design with intent. Simple questions to ask yourself are: who will grow the food? Who will eat the food? What yields are needed? What scale of financing is possible? These questions will help you select a production strategy. Most commercial rooftop farms deploy some combination of raised beds, row farming, and/or greenhouse hydroponics. You should consider how to best juggle construction costs with material integrity. For example, untreated white pine is an inexpensive raised bed material, but it will degrade quickly and need to be replaced. Cedar is much more expensive, but exhibits a much more long-lasting material integrity. A greenhouse could last a lifetime.
2| Financing the farm: Most North American rooftop farms are financed using a hodgepodge of approaches. These financing strategies often include some combination of loans, incentives (federal, state, or local), personal capitol, investor equity, parent company partnership, long-term purchasing agreement, and crowd-funding. Fleshing out your multi-faceted strategy within your business plan is paramount. During this process, allow your project goals, mission, and vision to drive your strategy. In addition to making your business run more smoothly, a thoroughly developed financing strategy that acutely targets a goal will be more attractive to investors than a half-cooked plan. Be specific, yet conservative, about cost and revenue projections.
3| Profits and payback: Each agricultural production method mentioned above – raised beds, row farming, and greenhouse hydroponics – exhibits pros and cons. The main financial consideration in selecting a method is whether you want a high cost, fast payback or low cost, slow payback approach. Again, there is no “right” approach; there are simply different strokes for different folks. When considering payback, research whether your city or state offers the following incentives for your rooftop farm: tax credits, tax abatements, subsidies, construction rebates, stormwater fee reductions, FAR bonuses, expedited permitting. Also consider that full-coverage rooftop row farms will increase the life of your building’s waterproofing membrane by 2-3 times, which presents additional long-term savings. A 1-2 storey building could additionally exhibit energy savings.
4| Personnel dance card: Staffing should be organized to meet your farm’s needs. Brooklyn Grange’s logistics, operations, and sales, for example, are run predominantly by the farm’s founding members. Farms built by Recover Green Roofs, by contrast, are typically owned by a parent company (such as Whole Foods Market or Fenway Park) and farmed by a partner company, Green City Growers. Another approach, deployed by Eagle Street Rooftop Farm, involves one head farmer aided by apprentices, interns (receiving college credit rather than a salary), and volunteers. Lufa Farms – a leading Canadian greenhouse hydroponic company – has a staff of over 50, organized into sub-teams for management, production, outreach, etc. Many of Lufa’s employees actually focus on developing technology, rather than on traditional production.
5| Innovative use of technology: One of the biggest differences between the sales approaches of rural and urban rooftop farms is the use of technology. Most rooftop farms rely on websites, blogs, and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) to build their brand and their audience/customers. One particularly innovative use of technology is Lufa Farm’s Online Marketplace, which allows the farm’s members to customize which farm goods they’d like each week. The goods are boxed and sent to local drop-off points around Montreal.
6| Replicating success: Your long-term financing strategy should consider one last key variable that many rooftop farming companies are already addressing: scale. Many farms choose to gain rooftop acreage through networked rooftops. If you want your rooftop farming company to be profitable, you’ll need to crunch some numbers to determine how big your raised beds, row farm, or greenhouse needs to be. Keep in mind that launching multiple farms should be a phased approach, so keep calm and farm on!
It’s hard to believe, but this week EAT UP | The Inside Scoop on Rooftop Agriculture turns two! My little bubelah is so grown up. Since EAT UP’s publication by New Society Publishers in spring 2013, urban farmers and gardeners across the world have been able to get their paws on the first full-length book about rooftop food production.
Some historians believe that rooftop agriculture dates back to 600 BCE Iraq, so how much could have possible changed in the past two years? As it turns out, a groundswell has emerged. When writing the first draft of EAT UP back in 2010, I posed the question of whether rooftop agriculture is viable. At that time, little published information existed on the subject, aside from a handful of magazine articles, so I began conducting interviews with the budding industry’s leaders. Annie Novak, Viraj Puri, Mohamed Hage, and Ben Flanner – all titans in the rooftop agriculture movement – were some of my first interviewees. These urban farmers and CEOs revealed that the question of viability was moot; rooftop agriculture is real and it’s happening.
In response to the rapidly blossoming North American rooftop agriculture movement, drafts two through four of the book increasingly shifted focus from viability analysis to how-to. Draft five (which was ultimately published as EAT UP) functions as a comprehensive resource featuring over 15 inspirational projects and offering readers the tools they need to pursue rooftop food production at three scales: gardening, farming, and industry.
During five short years of manuscript re-writes and post-publication, so many new rooftop farms and gardens have emerged that it’s become wonderfully impossible to keep track of each project. The rooftop agriculture movement has organically reached it’s twining shoots around balconies and fire escapes, up walls, and across school and spanning warehouse roofs. It’s everywhere. In fact, a recent National Gardening Association report found a 17% increase in households with edible gardens during the past five years (from EAT UP’s first draft to now), which includes more than 13 million millennials. The majority of millennials live in cities, so it’s conceivable that many of these gardens occupy urban settings. Oh how the tide has changed!
Geographically speaking, where has the greatest increase in rooftop farms and gardens emerged? As the birthplace of North America’s commercial rooftop agriculture industry and a city where space is at a premium, it’s no surprise that New York City makes the cut. Chicago and Toronto’s green roof bylaws and favorable urban agriculture regulations similarly lend themselves to industry growth, so there’s no surprise there.
And then there’s Boston. Between you and me, Boston’s leadership in the rooftop agriculture movement comes as an utterly wonderful surprise, given the city’s cold climate and moderate density. Many of the city’s high profile projects were designed and built by REcover Green Roofs, based in nearby Somerville, MA. The company’s first food roof was built in 2010 atop a restaurant called Ledge Kitchen & Drinks, with later installations above the Boston Design Center and Whole Foods Market Lynnfield. Just this week REcover Green Roofs’ newest food roof, Fenway Farm, began production at Boston’s own Major League Baseball stadium, Fenway Park. Stay tuned for an EAT UP Blog post on this farm soon.
How will the rooftop agriculture movement mature by EAT UP’s next few birthdays? That’s entirely up to you. Climb up there and get started!